This post was contributed by a community member. The views expressed here are the author's own.

Schools

School-Funding Issues Remain at Forefront 40 Years after Landmark Decision

Two key figures agree budget address today may set stage for yet another court ruling on aid for needier Abbott districts.

On the eve of Gov. Chris Christie’s budget address Monday, a far smaller crowd than the one expected in the Statehouse Tuesday came to Newark to hear two key figures involved in the landmark Abbott v. Burke rulings on equitable school funding.

Speaking to about 20 people gathered at Rutgers Law School were Paul Tractenberg, founding director of the Newark-based Education Law Center, which has led the school-funding litigation for more than 40 years, and former state Supreme Court Chief Justice Deborah Poritz, who served 10 years on the state’s top court and wrote two of the Abbott case’s 21 opinions to date.

Both gave detailed history lessons on the case, which started in the 1970s, stemming from a previous school-funding case -- Robinson v. Cahill -- that ultimately led to New Jersey’s income tax.

Find out what's happening in South Brunswickwith free, real-time updates from Patch.

Tractenberg argued those first Robinson cases before the high court. Poritz wrote two of the opinions, and acted on several others during her term from 1996 to 2006.

"They weren't all opinions, but they do take time," Poritz said. "Abbott was a constant issue for us."

Find out what's happening in South Brunswickwith free, real-time updates from Patch.

The most provocative discussion came as they both talked later about where the case was headed next, several times invoking the possibility of a 22nd Abbott decision from the court, depending on Christie’s budget message today.

“It’s still too early to tell,” said Poritz. “A lot will depend on what the governor says in his budget.”

The flashpoint has been over whether Christie will meet the letter of the court’s last Abbott decision, in 2009, which upheld full funding of the state’s School Funding Reform Act for at least the neediest districts, or whether the governor will seek to change some of the extra funding “weights” afforded at-risk students.

The Democratic-led Legislature has balked at those changes so far, although how far it would go to fight them if kept in the state budget is yet to be seen. The ELC has put the Christie administration on notice that it will challenge any changes in that funding formula.

“Will Christie adopt the changed weights, even though the Legislature has rejected them?” Tractenberg asked in what sounded almost like a dare.

“The situation continues what has become almost an unusual alignment of the players of late,” he said. “Now we have in maybe Abbott XXII, the law center saying they are on the side of the Legislature, and only it’s the governor who is the renegade.”

Continue reading on NJSpotlight.com.

NJ Spotlight is an issue-driven news website that provides critical insight to New Jersey’s communities and businesses. It is non-partisan, independent, policy-centered and community-minded.

We’ve removed the ability to reply as we work to make improvements. Learn more here

The views expressed in this post are the author's own. Want to post on Patch?