News Alert
Prosecutor: North Brunswick Man Falsely Claimed…

South Brunswick Municipal Budget to Carry No Tax Increase

Township eliminates tax increase without cutting any services.

After months of work to reduce a municipal tax increase, the Township Council is expected to finalize a budget plan that will not raise the tax rate at tonight's meeting.

, from 72 cents per $100 of assessed valuation to 75 cents. The council has since reduced the 3-cent , and has now cut the budget to a zero increase.

"I think this was very important for residents. There's a lot of unemployment problems and concerns with people's houses facing foreclosure, so things aren’t great in terms of the economy," said Mayor Frank Gambatese. " it could've been catastrophic for some residents if we also went up. It was very difficult for us to make progress on this, but I think all of the council, (Chief Financial Officer) Joe Monzo and (Township Manager) Bernie Hvozdovic did a great job getting this increase down to zero."

For the past several months, discussions were held with the township's various department heads looking for possible savings, but ultimately the South Brunswick’s services will remain intact without any significant cuts. The operating expenses for each department are expected to remain at 2011 spending levels, according to Councilman Joseph Camarota.

"We know our residents didn't want to see an increase, so the question was how do you do that without cutting back on services," Camarota said. "It was a juggling act. I know some people are concerned about this budget moving forward, but there's some additional help coming next year. We'll get some help from the pension and health reforms, the economy is starting to turn around, and we're going to be looking at reorganizing some of our departments. I think we can find some redundancy that we'll be able to eliminate and save money through, so that will be the goal for next year."

Getting from a $1.9 cent increase to zero was mainly accomplished through two sources of funding. The township received money back from the state for cleanup of a landfill on New Road, and used money through the Affordable Housing Trust Fund for prior work by township employees.

In 1984, the state pushed for a cleanup of the landfill on New Road, which required the township to put up about $400,000 until the site was cleaned, according to Gambatese.

"Unbeknownst to anybody, that site was determined to be clean by the state two years ago and nobody did anything about it," Gambatese said. "So (Hvozdovic) checked and found out it was deemed clean and sent a letter to the state. Then they informed us that they will be returning about $280,000 to us, so that's nearly a tax point right there."

The township also was able to use about $547,000 from the affordable housing trust fund to bring down the tax increase.

A reform passed under the Corzine Administration and signed into law in 2008, gave towns four years to spend their affordable housing trust fund money or lose it. South Brunswick had close to $8 million remaining in the fund. The township's Council on Affordable Housing (COAH) consultant informed the council they could dedicate money to fund previous work by township employees on phase three of the affordable housing plan going back to 2005.

"The township attorney, planner, and others all were working incessantly on that and put a lot of time into it, so we found out we were allowed to bill that time they spent working on affordable housing to COAH," Camarota said. 

Other areas of savings are expected to come from the council members eliminating a 7 percent raise for themselves, and from keeping departmental operating expenses at the same funding levels as 2011. The township will also take about $40,000 from the snow budget, leaving about $100,000 in the fund for the rest of 2012.

A major area of importance for the council was to avoid cutting spending on the backs of municipal employees through layoffs and furloughs. Over the last five years, South Brunswick is down 56 positions from layoffs and attrition, which reduced the township workforce from 295 people to 239 people.  

"For two years our employees had no pay increase, plus furloughs, so that's equivalent to a reduction in pay," Gambatese said. "We didn't want to do that again and we didn't want to have major layoffs. We can't let anyone else go without sacrificing major services. I was pleased when we got the increase down below 2-cents, so to get to zero made me really happy and that's important to do during these times. I see things starting to turn around with more new businesses coming in, so we hope this is the end of the economic troubles and we can start to move forward."

A public hearing on the budget that was introduced last month with a 3-cent tax increase will be held at tonight's council meeting, in accordance with state law. Following the hearing, the council will amend the introduced budget to reflect the changes that have been made since the introduction. The amended budget with no tax increase will be brought back for a public hearing on April 24, at which point the budget is expected to be adopted.

I am RIGHT April 10, 2012 at 12:22 PM
Unfortunately they used some one-time tricks to get to the point where they should have started the process. When the economy provides increased revenues to the town that money needs to be returned to the taxpayer through reductions in property taxes. Increased revenues don't mean increased spending.
Just me April 10, 2012 at 01:26 PM
Unfortunately it seems in this town increased revenues means increased spending. Not once has my tax bill gone down in 20 years. No long term efficiencies have been realized during that time. I can't believe they even had the nerve to have included a 7% increase for themselves and the Finance group in the rencent proposal. And I am only calling out those two groups since they have the most input into the budget development. Big increases elsewhere as well.
Eric April 10, 2012 at 09:52 PM
So, let me see if I have this correct...28 years ago the Township put up money to clean up a site, which, then 2 years ago was "deemed" clean...and NO ONE NOTICES THAT MONEY SHOULD BE RETURNED TO THE TOWNSHIP UNTIL NOW??? Hello??
Crazy World April 11, 2012 at 05:10 AM
Keeping the municipal taxes neutral is a great accomplishment, but when are my taxes actually going to go down? Property values are down and the economy is still not the greatest, so every little bit helps. Have you looked at your sewer bill? Are the sewer pipes made of gold? Why are we paying nearly $130 a quarter for just the sewer bill? That amounts to over $ 500 dollars a year - that's over double what my yearly water bill is. I checked with freinds and family who live in other towns in NJ and they can't believe what we pay for sewer. What can be done to correct this burden?
Eric April 11, 2012 at 09:06 PM
I was also wondering exactly why they are adding on to the Senior Center? If one journeys into the Center after 2 pm, it is absolutely empty, not a soul in the place. So why the expansion? Seems to be more wasteful spending. Being a senior myself, I decided to speak to some of the members and found that most of them are "transients" visiting for a month or so from India. So, they are actually not South Brunswick residents are they? I suggest that the Mayor, Council and any other interested parties look further into this as perhaps the "Open Space" money could be put to use for something truly necessary.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »