Fine Print: Safe Playing Field Act

Proposed measure restricts the use of pesticides and other poisons where kids play.

What it is: The proposed Safe Playing Field Act places new restrictions on the use of pesticides on elementary school and childcare center playgrounds and fields. Sponsored by state Sens. Shirley Turner (D-Mercer) and Robert Gordon (D-Bergen), the Senate Bill S-1143 was unanimously endorsed by the Senate environmental committee last week.

What it means: The bill has been supported through a loud and active public campaign, with supporters lobbying hard in the Statehouse and canvassers going door to door in some communities to urge residents to press its passage. But despite the apparent political support, the measure has had a tough time reaching final passage.

Voting record: A version of this bill passed once in the Senate last year, but not the Assembly. And while a compromise version was introduced and approved in the Senate committee this week, some supporters say the Senate’s Democratic leadership has yet to agree to post for final vote.

Turner’s prediction: “I’m hoping we’ll get it posted in January when we come back. We have gotten this out of committee before, so we have had to start over. But I hope we can get it done in January.”

What’s in the way: Most of the opposition has come from the chemical, pesticide, and landscaping industries, which maintain that there are misconceptions as to the health hazards and applications of pesticides in such settings.

Industry perspective: “Perceptions being put forward by very concerned mothers who are not aware of the very strict guidelines that are set by the EPA,” said Nancy Sadlon, executive director of the NJ Green Industry Council. “Nobody is arguing that these aren’t toxic substances, but what we don’t agree on is that there is, in fact, a lot of testing and training with these products.”

Turner’s retort: “We don’t need the chemicals to accomplish what we want. And the most important of course is to protect the health and safety of our children, and we can do that with alternative methods. We heard that over and over in testimony.”

Compromise: The latest version of the bill did step back on the scope of the measure, removing nonschool public recreation fields and playgrounds from those areas where pesticides would be banned.

Continue reading on NJSpotlight.com.

NJ Spotlight is an issue-driven news website that provides critical insight to New Jersey’s communities and businesses. It is non-partisan, independent, policy-centered and community-minded.

Just Saying December 27, 2012 at 10:41 PM
Ok. They agree that they are toxic substances. But they feel there have not been enough tests or training with these products. Well since toxic substances are known to be harmful, we should ban all pesticides in all locations, until adequate testing and training has been done. How could we allow toxic substances to be used in any area used by people (or even pets), without knowing the health consequences associated with them?


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »